Identifiable Criminal Behavior Modus Operandi And Signature

Modus Operandi In criminal forensic behavioral analysis there are two identifiable criminal behavior that Modus Operandi and Signature. Modus Operandi and a criminal’s signature the two terms that have similarities however the terms represent totally different criminal behavior (van Gijn, E. L., Lamb, M. E., 2013). In general all criminals have Modus Operandi because this is someone peculiarities in behavior, however not every criminal have a signature which is a particular mark or stamp left to exemplify their presence on a crime scene. Let review the brief history of both terms. Let’s begin with the term Modus Operandi which means the particular way someone does something in the criminal justice system it is used to describe the â€Å"behavioral strategies criminals use to obtain and retain their victims† thing the criminal believes work (Bartol, Bartol, 2016). Everyone has habit or techniques they used to complete a task this is the same when committing a crime. There are three major perpetration of a crime in order when a criminal is engaging in a criminal activity number one mapping out ways to complete the crime, number two have an escape a way to get out, and lastly having a way to avoid capture (Bartol, Bartol, 2016).. While engaging in the criminal offense criminals tend to form or show habits or patterns, which can be detected by forensic phycologist or the investigator. Serial offenders often prefect their Modus Operandi they evolve from their mistake the

People Meet Nature By Knut Rasmussen - 1663 Words

In the book People Meet Nature, Knut Rasmussen, a Danish explorer, tells the story of his meeting with an Eskimo named Sealdog. Throughout the time they spent together Sealdog told Knut multiple stories, all of which contained morals. However, one of the stories stood out to Knut, due to its lack of a larger lesson. When he asked Sealdog for the meaning behind the story, Sealdog mentioned that not all stories needed to have morals to be meaningful. Sometimes stories can be told for the sake of humor or enjoyment (Isberg, 2007). Often people feel the need to attribute a greater significance to everything and disregard what they perceive as useless. In this paper, I will be looking at whether or not there is a requirement in society for art and literature to be useful. The utility of diverse art forms stems from an individual’s unique perspective which many differ from the societal conceptions and the need one has to express one’s opinions. According to dictionary.com, t he definition of useful is â€Å"being of use or service; serving some purpose† (Useful). To be useful, something needs to be able to be applied. In regards to this paper, for a work of art and literature to be useful means that it needs to be applicable in society. In her passage, Freeland states Kant’s way of thinking which is that â€Å"something beautiful has ‘purposiveness without a purpose’† (2001). Having purposiveness with purpose means that in life many things can end up having a purpose without theShow MoreRelatedCommon Knowledge : How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know56617 Words   |  227 PagesOrganizational learning. 2. Business enterprisesCommunication systems. 3. Intellectual cooperation. 4. Information networks-Economic aspects. 5. Success in business. I. Title. HD58.82 .D585 2000 658.4 5-dc21 99048879 The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Publications and Documents in Libraries and Archives Z39.481992. Page v FOR MY SONS WHOSE LIVES HAVE SO GREATLY ENRICHED MY OWN: STEPHEN DIXON JOHNSON RICHARD SCOTT

Impact of Brexit

Question: Discuss about theImpact of Brexit. Answer: Brexit- An Introduction To understand the effects of Brexit, one must understand its meaning first. Brexit is a name given to the event that happened in Europe. Europe is a large continent, having many countries. Out of which, 28 countries have signed an economic and political treaty after the Second World War. These countries are together known as European Economic Community (EEC) or European Union (EU). This treaty was signed to avoid wars among countries and foster co-operation in terms of trade and business. The entire EU works as a single market. This implies that goods and people can move freely without any formal requirements. EU has its own parliament and own currency, which is known as Euro, used by its 19 members. UK or United Kingdom of Great Britain was also a member of EU. But at the start of 2016, it wanted to leave the group and continue as an independent country. In June 2016, a referendum was passed to leave EU since 52% of the population voted and supported the idea. If we see the results in more detail, UK comprises of 4 countries- England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Irelands. Englands 53.4% population voted to leave EU. Such share in Wales amounted to 52.5%. However, in Scotland, only 38% and in Northern Irelands, only 44.2% voted to leave EU. Hence, the term Brexit implies exit of Britain from EU. It will have many political and economic implications on UK, European and global economies (Mller Oliver, 2014). Arguments in Support of Brexit The elderly people of UK strongly support Brexit. The most prominent reason was immigration. Migrants from all over the Europe came to take away jobs and vacancies in schools, universities, etc. from British people. They argued that their own people are left with very few opportunities because of this issue. Another reason was that after Brexit, British economy will strengthen since they will be able to trade in their interests. Hence, supporters wanted Britain to be the Great Britain. Besides that, they do not want bureaucrats of Brussels to design their future. They wanted to be independent and flexible. That is why, majority of the people supported Brexit (Melville, 2016). Arguments Against Brexit The first reason of opposing Brexit was status quo. Majority of youth of UK proposed that they have immense job opportunities in their country because of foreign organizations operating here. They will be lost completely and there will be an employment crisis in the country. Secondly, Brexit will force business organizations and government to move to a new way, which will lead to a great uncertainty in future. It will also be a big blow to middle class households. Besides, being a part of friendly treaty is a safety sign from wars like uncertainties. These were the reasons to oppose Brexit (Vasilopoulou, 2006). Impact of Brexit A serious political and economic impact can be seen in various parts of the world due to Brexit. UK, which had been a prominent place of international trade with many countries of EU and others, had lost its attractiveness. Its currency is depreciating and a situation of chaos and confusion is prevailing in the country. On the other hand Europe has not remained untouched. If a part of body is not well, the entire body suffers. Likewise, a significant part of EU has left, so its economy is also hampered due to Brexit. Besides, London had been a financial hub with more than 250 foreign banks and more than 200 foreign law firms. They have endangered London to quit their operations from there. Their stocks are heavily impacted in return. Apart from that, they will not be able to continue business in such a convenient manner as earlier (Irwin, 2015). Impact on Currency Values The referendum of June 2016 on UKs leave from EU has created a scene of great uncertainty in the market. Currency market is one of the most vital components of entire financial system. Direct impact would be on UK and European currency. Since the Brexit is confirmed, both the currencies are falling. However, depreciation in pound sterling is much more significant than that of euro. The impact on other currencies will be seen later when this referendum will be executed in a year or two. Reason of this influence is that trading terms among various countries are going to change significantly after Brexit. This will affect payment of export- imports. Hence, there will be a change in currency valuation (Begg Mushvel, 2016). Impact on Stock Markets The UKs decision to leave European Union has given a great shock to the investors. Across the global financial markets, there are shockwaves due to this referendum. The pound and euro had a vital impact. Besides that, if we talk particularly about stock markets, FTSE100, which is an index of top 100 stocks of UK, had fallen sharply due to initial impact of Brexit. However, it has started recovering. But it still needs to stabilise. Secondly, a vast index of top 250 stocks is also showing a fall out. This clarifies an adverse impact of brexit on stock markets (Dhingra et al., 2016). Impact on UK Market Initial impacts on UK can be seen clearly. Although supporters are saying that there will be no adverse impact. Since the entire country has currently faced the issue strongly and initial shocks are borne boldly there will be no issues further. But the long- term impact on the UK economy will be deteriorating to the country. Firstly, London, the financial hub is going to lose its attractiveness in terms of investments rather the entire economy will face a run down in the investors confidence. Currently, the effect can be seen on GBP (Great Britain Pound). Since the referendum of June 2016 has been declared, the currency is facing a significant downfall. Britain was considered at the top in terms of AAA rating, which is not so now. Many economic indicators are pointing towards a downturn in business cycle in UK. It has also been said that if not controlled smartly, this issue will have a severe impact than that of the global financial crisis of 2008 (Dhingra et al., 2016). Impact on Global Markets The entire European Union and even the rest parts of the world will have a direct bearing due to Brexit. However, major impact would be on member countries of EU. This impact will be significant in political, economic and financial terms. Exports within EU are allowed without any tariffs or duties. However, these will be levied now in trading with UK. Besides that, supply chain of many industries will be hampered worldwide. Many big entrepreneurs are going to face a critical challenge in managing their investments and policy returns. One of the major impacts on Europe will be that their cost of borrowing might rise. There will be a serious political concern in EU. If this leaving Union goes successful, it will encourage other member states to do the same, which will destabilise the political conditions in Europe. Europe will lose its significance in such a scenario (Irwin, 2015). Role of Governments and Central Banks The role of governments to manage the chaos, confusion and uncertainty can be critically determined only when the actual outcomes can be seen. However, they can do to something even now to keep a hold on current situation. Currency of a country is depreciated or appreciated due to market changes. But a central government can intervene and revalue or devalue the currency according to the scenario. Besides that, central banks should critically keep an eye on economic indicators. They can influence interest rates that can deter the impact on Europe. The cost of borrowing can be controlled in such a manner. Hence, in uncertainty even, some steps can be taken to reduce the adverse impact and bring stability in economy (Yencken, 2016). References Begg, I. Mushvel, F., 2016. The economic impact of brexit: jobs, growth and the public finances. [Online] Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LSE-Commission/Hearing-11---The-impact-of-Brexit-on-jobs-and-economic-growth-sumary.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2016]. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G.I., Sampson, T. Van Reenen, J., 2016. The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards. Center for Economic Performance. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T. Van Reenen, J., 2016. The impact of Brexit on foreign investment in the UK. Centre for Economic Performance (CEP). Irwin, G., 2015. BREXIT: the impact on the UK and the EU. [Online] Available at: https://www.global-counsel.co.uk/sites/default/files/special-reports/downloads/Global%20Counsel_Impact_of_Brexit.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2016]. Melville, T., 2016. The Brexit Referendum: How did it come to this?. Reuters. Mller, A. Oliver, T., 2014. The United Kingdom and the European Union: what would a Brexit mean for the EU and other States around the World? European and global perspectives. The German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP). Vasilopoulou, S., 2006. UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit Referendum. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), pp.219-27. Yencken, E., 2016. Envisioning the Brexit: The potential implications of a UK exit on the EUs relations with third countries. Australia: The University of Melbourne.

Total War in Modern World History

One of the history’s seeming paradoxes is the fact that, the more humanity appears to be affiliated with the values of progress and enlightenment, the bloodier are the wars, in which the world’s most technologically and culturally advanced countries find themselves plunged into.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Total War in Modern World History specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Nevertheless, despite the paradoxical subtleties of the phenomenon in question, the earlier mentioned state of affairs can be best referred to, as such that has been dialectically predetermined by the very laws of history. In this paper, I will explore the validity of the above-stated at length, while promoting the idea that the very emergence of the term ‘total war’ cannot be discussed outside of the fact that, throughout the course of the 19th and 20th centuries, it was specifically the Westerners’ gr owing awareness of what the concept of ‘nationhood’ stands for, which began to define the qualitative dynamics on the arena of international politics. The origins of the term ‘total war’ can be traced back to the era of the Napoleonic Wars. After all, it was namely Napoleon, who took a practical advantage of the policy of a nationwide ‘mass mobilization’, as the main principle of staffing the French army with soldiers (Broers 253). This suggestion contains a clue, as to why it proved possible for Napoleon to be able to do it, in the first place. Ever since the time of the French Great Revolution, it became a commonplace practice among Europeans to go about constructing their sense of self-identity along the lines of what happened to be the particulars of these people’s national, rather than religious or socially-sectarian affiliation. In its turn, this predetermined the main characteristic of the Napoleonic Wars – the fact that, d uring the course of hostilities, the combatants on both warring sides tended to perceive the significance of their involvement, as such that related to what these people were, in the ethno-cultural sense of this word. It is needless to mention, of course, that this created objective preconditions for the concerned warfare to be marked with utter cruelty – one of the total war’s main features.Advertising Looking for term paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The reason for this is apparent – the very paradigm of war between the two or more nations presupposes that, regardless of what happened to be their age, gender or social status, the citizens from from involved countries do contribute (directly or indirectly) to the continually applied war-effort. In its turn, this naturally makes the legitimate targets of military operations. This suggestion explains the sheer cruelty, with which the French soldiers were trying to ‘pacify’ the Spanish civilians, during the course of the so-called ‘Peninsular War’ (1807-1814). Nevertheless, its contemporary sounding the concept of ‘total war’ has attained at the time of the WW1. After all, it is not only that this war resulted in the deaths of great many civilians, but also it has brought about the rise of a new military strategy, the advocates of which believed that the war’s actual objectives must be consistent with the notion of ‘totality’. Eventually, this resulted in the qualitative transformation of the term ‘soldier’. Whereas, prior to the outbreak of the WW1, soldiers used to be encouraged to act in the ‘knightly’ manner, while at the front-line, from the year 1914 onwards, this effectively ceased to be the case. The mentioned war’s ‘totality’ resulted in the creation of the situation when, regardless of what happened to be the particulars of their national affiliation, the front-line soldiers began to be progressively discussed in terms of a ‘cannon meat’ (Neilson 19). The historical account of the WW1, provides us with the insight into what can be considered the additional indications of a particular military clash deserving to be considered a ‘total war’. These indications can be outlined as follows: a) The deployment of the airforce, as the mean of causing damage to the hostile country’s economic infrastructure and the instrument of terrifying civilians. The validity of this suggestion can be well illustrated in regards to the bombing missions, carried out by German Zeppelins against the city of London through the years 1915-1918. b) The dramatic boost, provided to the pace of the technological progress by the ongoing hostilities. As a direct consequence of the WW1, the Western civilization has undergone nothing short of a technological revolution.Advertising W e will write a custom term paper sample on Total War in Modern World History specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More For example, before the outset of the WW1, there were only 600 internal-combustion vehicles in Britain; whereas, by the time this war ended, the country’s automotive industry has managed to manufacture 60.000 cars, which differed drastically in quality/technology from the ones produced before the war. The reason for this is apparent – only the states (at the time of a ‘total war’) are able to invest adequately in the economy’s technologically intense sectors, while overlooking the scope of potential hazards – these hazards to not come even remotely close to the danger of the country’s territory facing the prospect of being occupied by the enemy. c) The fact that those states that end up losing a ‘total war’, are commonly being deprived of their de facto independence. For example, according to the Treaty of Versailles, signed in the aftermath of the WW1, Germany was required to pay an enormous monetary contribution, while forbidden to continue maintaining its military airforce and fleet, which in turn has effectively reduced this country into nothing short of a semi-independent ‘bantustan’. d) The deployment of wartime propaganda for the purpose of dehumanizing the enemy. In the time of the WW1, it became a commonplace practice, on the part of the warring countries’ governments, to invest heavily in the production of propagandistic posters, which portrayed the enemy soldiers as murderous beasts, who were born to kill and destroy, as their only the purpose in life (Strayer 1025). This, of course, created additional prerequisites for the WW1to end up gaining the fame of being utterly atrocious. Nevertheless, it was namely during the course of the WW2, that the term ‘total war’ has attained its modern-day meaning. P artially, this has to do with the fact that it was in 1943 that this term was mentioned for the first time by Dr. Goebbels, when he was holding his famous ‘Sportpalace Speech’ in Berlin.Advertising Looking for term paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More While addressing the crowd, he pointed out that, regardless of what happened to be their gender and age, all Germans are expected to actively contribute to the country’s ongoing war-effort (Overy 622). However, the actual reason why many historians refer to the WW2, as the most illustrative example of what ‘total war’ is all about, is that during the course of this war, the actual objective of many military operations (at least on the part of the Germans) became the physical elimination of the whole nations. For example, as it is now being known for just about anyone, Nazis strived for nothing less than ‘freeing’ world of Jews, in the physical sense of this word. Essentially the same they planned to do with the Russians – the so-called ‘Plan Ost’, designed by the SS Reichsfà ¼hrer Himmler, contained a number of detailed provisions, as to how the population of Russians could be reduced down to 30 million, within the matter of 10 y ears. It needs to be mentioned that, in respect of conducting a particularly atrocious warfare (‘total war’), the Allies did not fall too far behind their German counterparts. The full legitimacy of this statement can be shown in relation to the Allied bombing of Dresden on February 13, 1945, during the course of which, at least 75.000 of German civilians have lost their lives in the artificially created firestorms (Beck 332). The nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the US, stands out as yet another illustrative example – even though that there was no any immediate military necessity to proceed with this bombing, President Truman nevertheless did choose in favor of it. This provides us with the clue, as to the probably the most crucial sign that a particular war may indeed be discussed in terms of the ‘total’ one – the warring parties’ preoccupation with trying to kill as many ‘enemy’ civilians, as possible. Within the context of a ‘total war’, the considerations of morality have no place, whatsoever, because this type of war is being fought exactly for the purpose of ‘freeing’ the most attractive environmental niches on the planet, which in turn can only be achieved by the mean of elimination these niches’ former occupants physically – pure and simple. In light of what has been said earlier, in regards to the discussed subject matter, the paper’s initial thesis may indeed be considered thoroughly valid. After all, as it was shown, it is namely the objective laws of history that predetermine the outbreaks of ‘total wars’ and not the ongoing ‘decline of morals’, as some naà ¯ve people continue to believe. Works Cited Beck, Earl. â€Å"The Allied Bombing of Germany, 1942-1945, and the German Response: Dilemmas of Judgment.† German Studies Review 5.3 (1982): 325-337. Print. Broers, Michael. â€Å"The Concept of â⠂¬ËœTotal War’ in the Revolutionary Napoleonic Period.† War in History 15.3 (2008): 247-268. Print. Neilson, Keith. â€Å"Total War: Total History.† Military Affairs 51.1 (1987): 17-21. Print. Overy, R. J. â€Å"Mobilization for Total War in Germany 1939-1941.† The English  Historical Review 103.408 (1988): 613-639. Print. Strayer, Robert. Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources, Volume  2. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012. Print. This term paper on Total War in Modern World History was written and submitted by user Jovani S. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.